The news Al Gore should read.
Consensus? What Consensus?
Chill out. Get Informed.
Last month the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Hadley Climate Research Unit (CRU) was caught red-handed fabricating data on research of climate change. Phil Jones, the head of the CRU which consists of some of the preeminent climatologists in the world, has resigned in shame. Michael Mann, a Penn State climatologist who is also at the heart of this collusion is under investigation. This data is used by many all over the world to justify that man is causing global warming.
And now NASA is being sued for fabricating data on anthropogenic global warming after changing their opinion on 1934 being the hottest year on record to 1998 without providing any shred of evidence.
The effects of this travesty are reaching to all corners of the globe. India is refusing to go forward spending their time and treasure to combat this hoax. Australia has stood against the eco-radical agenda by shooting down a climate change bill similar to the cap-and-trade monstrosity currently being debated in Congress. Saudi Arabia has called for a formal investigation with the United Nations. The GOP here in the United States is also pushing for a formal inquiry.
Oh boy, when it rains, it pours!
There absolutely and unequivocally is no consensus in the scientific community that global warming exists and/or is caused fully, or in part, by humans. It is shocking that these discredited climatologists base their data on the temperatures from the last 100 years. The Earth is billions of years old and has witnessed many variations in temperature. Using the last 100 years to explain temperature changes for the history of the planet is utterly ridiculous. That is like saying that because it rained today that means it must have rained everyday this year.
Don’t take my word for it; take a gander at some of the peer-reviewed articles arguing that global warming is cyclical. Or perhaps read the book, "Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 years," by Virginia's own world renowned climate physicist S. Fred Singer.
Do eco-radicals come from such privileged lives that they really think there aren’t serious problems in the world like starvation, poverty, war and disease? How do they justify creating problems out of thin air? I guess if there is a profit to be made then that makes it right in their eyes. The scientists at the CRU were receiving millions in research grants. As long as there was proof of anthropogenic global warming then they would continue to receive funding.
The fact is that eco-radicals amount to modern day alchemists who wasted their lives trying to turn lead into gold. In the end, no matter how much you want something impossible to be true it just doesn’t add up.
With this Climategate scandal, global warming is no longer a legitimate scientific fact, it’s a punch line. Additionally, the attacks that global warming alarmists level at detractors are shameful.
The always courageous Sarah Palin punched eco-radicals in the mouth this week with a hard-hitting op-ed on the politics of climate change. Palin, who enrages the left every time she opens her mouth, signs a book, or walks down the street, increased their anger by having the boldness to publish it in the liberal bible that is the Washington Post.
She was quickly lambasted by Al Gore and other eco-radicals, many of whom argued that she isn’t a scientist, has no basis for her opinions, and is a “flat-earther.”
Of course, Al Gore, whose higher education resume on the environment includes taking one college course in 1967, somehow seems to qualify him as an “expert” on anthropogenic global warming.
Never mind that Palin, who addresses this in her op-ed, created a subcabinet as the Governor of Alaska to address climate change and witnessed its cyclical effects first hand from the only arctic state in the country.
The great Senator Inhofe (R-OK) perhaps summed up the hypocrisy of anthropogenic global warming the best when he said, “Until this year, any scientist, reporter or politician who dared raise even the slightest suspicion about the science behind global warming was dismissed and repeatedly mocked.’’ Now that time is over with the shame of the fabrication of scientific data.
As he mockingly proclaimed, “We won, you lost, get a life.”
Now let’s please start focusing our efforts on solving real problems.